<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Openobserve on Ishan Jain</title>
		<link>https://www.bloodraven.in/tags/openobserve/</link>
		<description>Recent content in Openobserve on Ishan Jain</description>
		<generator>Hugo</generator>
		<language>en-us</language>
		
		
		
		
			<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
			<atom:link href="https://www.bloodraven.in/tags/openobserve/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
			<item>
				<title>From Huffman to OpenObserve: Why Your 10GB Log File Fits in 3GB</title>
				<link>https://www.bloodraven.in/writing/from-huffman-to-openobserve-why-your-10gb-log-file-fits-in-3gb/</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid>https://www.bloodraven.in/writing/from-huffman-to-openobserve-why-your-10gb-log-file-fits-in-3gb/</guid>
				<description>&lt;p&gt;Every SRE has run &lt;code&gt;gzip&lt;/code&gt; on a log file and watched 10GB collapse into 3GB. It feels like magic. It is not. It is a handful of very old, very simple ideas about redundancy, and once you understand them, the storage numbers behind modern observability tools stop looking like marketing and start looking like arithmetic.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Let me walk from first principles up to how a tool like OpenObserve turns those principles into a 140x cost gap.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
